Scientific and Technical Council
27.07.2017
Decision of the Scientific and Technical Council of SEC NRSThe issues considered
On the first issueUpon listening to the presentation made by A. Ponizov, Head of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities Safety Division, concerning the activities carried out during the fourth stage of the R&D “Scientific and methodological assistance to implementation of the Federal Target Programme “Nuclear and Radiation Safety in 2016–2020 and until 2030” for preparation to and implementation of decommissioning of nuclear legacy facilities and on special radioactive waste management” with the purpose to ensure the implementation of work “Preparation and practical application of new and highly effective technologies in the course of nuclear and radiation hazardous facilities decommissioning” and after speaking in debate, STC has noted thatUnder the frames of the R&D “Scientific and methodological assistance to implementation of the Federal Target Programme “Nuclear and Radiation Safety in 2016–2020 and until 2030” for preparation to and implementation of decommissioning of nuclear legacy facilities and on special radioactive waste management” with the purpose to ensure the implementation of work “Preparation and practical application of new and highly effective technologies in the course of nuclear and radiation hazardous facilities decommissioning”, the development of the three draft Safety Guides is to be completed; these documents shall present the requirements regarding:
At the previous stage of research and development works there were prepared Explanatory Notes to the first revisions of draft Safety Guides, and mailing of the first revisions of draft Safety Guides was carried out to receive comments. Based on the obtained proposals and comments there were prepared the Summary Lists of Comments to the first revisions of draft Safety Guides, and the first draft revisions of Safety Guides were adequately updated. Concerning item IAt the fourth stage of research and development works in the course of implementation of the first item, the concerned organizations (29 in total) were mailed the Summary List of Comments for the Revision 1 of the draft Safety Guide, and the updated Revision 1 of the draft Safety Guide was forwarded together with the Explanatory Note. The consensus meeting was held with regard to the Summary List of Comments to the Revision 1 of the draft Safety Guide (the MoM of May 3, 2017). Based on the outcomes of the consensus meeting the final revision of the draft Safety Guide and the Explanatory Note were prepared. Major issues of the consensus meeting on the draft Safety Guide were related to:
Concerning item IIIn frames of activities related to the second item, the concerned organizations (23 in total) were mailed the Summary List of Comments for the Revision 1 of the draft Safety Guide, and the updated Revision 1 of the draft Safety Guide was forwarded together with the Explanatory Note. The consensus meeting was held with regard to the Summary List of Comments to the Revision 1 of the draft Safety Guide (the MoM of May 3, 2017). Based on the outcomes of the consensus meeting the final revision of the draft Safety Guide and the Explanatory Note were prepared. Major issues of the consensus meeting on the draft Safety Guide were related to:
Concerning item IIIIn frames of activities related to the third item, the concerned organizations (25 in total) were mailed the Summary List of Comments for the Revision 1 of the draft Safety Guide, and the updated Revision 1 of the draft Safety Guide was forwarded together with the Explanatory Note. The consensus meeting was held with regard to the Summary List of Comments to the Revision 1 of the draft Safety Guide (the MoM of May 4, 2017). Based on the outcomes of the consensus meeting the final revision of the draft Safety Guide and the Explanatory Note were prepared. Major issues of the consensus meeting on the draft Safety Guide were related to:
The MoMs of the consensus meetings state that the structure and general content of the updated first revisions of the draft Safety Guides can serve as the basis for further activities related to preparation of the final revisions of the draft Safety Guides. The Developer is recommended to prepare the final revisions of the draft Safety Guides on the basis of the updated first revisions of the draft Safety Guides, List of Comments, as well as with the account of comments and proposals made by the participants of the consensus meetings. In respect to the first issue, STC has decided to:
Scientific and Technical Council of SEC NRS is considered to be the permanent advisory body, which includes its Chairman (SEC NRS Director), Deputy Chairmen (Deputy Directors), Scientific Secretary, members of STC (regular members) and Council of Elders – the honorable members of STC from among scientific workers who have made significant contribution to the development of the main directions of SEC NRS activity. Basic tasks of Scientific and Technical Council:
In accordance with basic tasks of STC, it summarizes and analyses domestic and international experience in nuclear and radiation safety regulation, makes recommendations for its enhancement and advance; addresses issues and makes proposals in respect to the directions of SEC NRS activities including compilation, analysis and dissimilation of scientific experience and knowledge in the field of nuclear and radiation safety regulation. Consequently, Scientific and Technical Council is considered to be as the biggest internal platform for scientific discussions regarding agenda issues. |
STATE ASSIGNMENT REGULATORY DOCUMENTS INFORMATION PRODUCTS BOOKSRostechnadzor experts obtain the data released by SEC NRS through a special procedure . |